Deep Cover by Liam

[raw]
made by Liam for Ludum Dare 48 (COMPO)

After the stupid sounding Disunification War, future London has been split into east and west, a microcosm of the fractured island. You are a deep cover double agent fighting to keep from suspicion and place the spotlight on others.

The aim of the game is keep your cover intact and raise suspicions about your opponents.

Play online here, desktop window size

Screenshot 2021-04-26 at 01.43.29.png

If you or they hit 100% suspicion then that person loses. You, as a double agent, have a suspicion percentage for each faction, red and blue.

Each turn, play cards from your hand in front of you by clicking them.

Counter Accusation!: Increases the suspicion of your opponent. The more loyal you are to a faction, the more damage your word does.

Sow Dissent!: Increases your perceived loyalty to the faction of the opponent you are facing (and decreases to the opposite faction).

Loyal Friend: Removes an Under Suspicion from your hand(& deck). Click the card first, and then an Under Suspicion to remove.

Under Suspicion: This card cannot be played & will add 2 to your suspicion at turn end.

Tell A Tale: Push your luck by drawing cards one at a time. Each card drawn adds to the cards defence value. However, increasing the cards defense will add a Under Suspicion to your deck. If you draw two of the same card or only one, then the defense is decreased by one. You must play the card to activate the defense. Max defense is 20.

It is possible with strong enough defenses to reduce your suspicion each turn.

Please refresh to play again, some game data is not getting reset correctly on game end

Screenshot 2021-04-26 at 01.45.48.png

Your deck starts with: - 3 x Tell A Tale - 3 x Sow Dissent! - 2 x Loyal Friend - 4 x Counter Accusation!

Ratings

Overall 583th 3.259⭐ 29🧑‍⚖️
Fun 638th 3.019⭐ 29🧑‍⚖️
Innovation 267th 3.558⭐ 28🧑‍⚖️
Theme 677th 3.167⭐ 29🧑‍⚖️
Graphics 676th 3.019⭐ 29🧑‍⚖️
Audio 702th 1.6⭐ 22🧑‍⚖️
Humor 319th 2.804⭐ 25🧑‍⚖️
Mood 747th 2.654⭐ 28🧑‍⚖️
Given 32🗳️ 30🗨️

Feedback

Peace Of Cake Games
26. Apr 2021 · 06:57 UTC
Now this is pretty darn cool! Kind of like card games meet politics meets Among Us. Very very original, I had a blast becoming the most "sus"!
🎤 Liam
26. Apr 2021 · 09:12 UTC
@peace-of-cake-games thanks for the kind words! It was maybe a little bit too complicated an idea to pull off. Glad you had fun!
AnthonyHarmitage
26. Apr 2021 · 11:11 UTC
Would love to see this with more text and with more or less real politics inside) Could be great satire piece.
Bigbadbison
26. Apr 2021 · 11:13 UTC
It was a little confusing at first, and I'm still not sure I understand the mechanics completely, but I enjoyed it!
🎤 Liam
26. Apr 2021 · 11:37 UTC
@anthonyharmitage Haha, was a difficult decision on Sunday about how to spend my time: writing jokes etc or smoothing mechanics/difficulty out. One of the ideas I would have loved to work in was the idea that the two factions were led by deep ones, Cthulu-esque gods and cults mixed into the politics maybe to be a bit more on point for the theme. Time always the problem! Thanks for playing!
🎤 Liam
26. Apr 2021 · 11:38 UTC
@bigbadbison Thanks, glad you enjoyed it! Definitely would have liked to smooth out the learning difficulty and mechanics/UI so it was a bit clearer. I've learnt a lot about making card games this jam!
stmatn
26. Apr 2021 · 11:58 UTC
Really cool game!

At first it was a bit confusing, but once I got my head around the rules, it was really fun. Well at least at first. TBH you could crank up the difficulty. I finished with -29% suspicion on red and something around -6% on blue. Maybe the cover identities should noit give defense points when you loose the minigame? Once my identities improved to around 20, suspicion went down each turn (on average).

All in all verry fun game :)
🎤 Liam
26. Apr 2021 · 12:42 UTC
@stmatn Thanks for playing! I know what you mean, I was balancing difficulty up until the last minute to get the right balance as you progress through the game. Originally identities were capped at 10, I should probably have reduced them from 20 (maybe 14/15 is the sweet spot) when I added 2 Loyal Friends instead of 1. It's also a bug being able to get below 0 suspicion, should stop at zero!
stmatn
26. Apr 2021 · 13:07 UTC
@liam Well balancing is something that I really dread since it seems to be quite hard. I think to get it right you either need to play lots and lots of times or come up with a way to compute (or at least estimate) the probability of winning. Or both :)

After some time I started to always draw exactly one additional card on story telling. If I had exactly the starting deck in the draw pile this strategy would give me ~80% chance to level up. (When the deck gets bloated with suspicion this number might go down) So in 4/5 cases it would increase defense by 2 and in 1/5 cases decrease by 1. So on average it will increase by 1.4 points each time you play that card with that strategy and deck. You could bring this average down to no increase by reducing the defence by 8 on each fail (or nerfing the gain by dividing by 8). In order to find a good factor I would try come up with a way to automatically simulate that mini game for a given card deck (and hand) and use this (obviously rough and flawed) calculation as a starting point.

Enough math lessons for now. The game is fun after all :D
Loig
26. Apr 2021 · 15:27 UTC
Nice game, with very good ideas. I liked it.

By reading the rules it was a bit difficult to understand how to play. But after a few seconds playing it becomes clear.

It would indeed require a bit more balancing, but achieving a good balancing in such a short time is not an easy task.

Also, I would have liked to get information on the new cards added to my deck at each encounter (maybe it is somewhere and I missed it?).
🎤 Liam
26. Apr 2021 · 15:34 UTC
@loig You're 100% right there, wish I'd had more time to work out some better instructions/tutorial/tooltips. I think one of the critical things the game is missing is a way to look at the deck and discard piles, that would help you understand what cards are added. Thanks for playing!
LSK
26. Apr 2021 · 15:36 UTC
I love the aesthetic and enjoyed playing this, but I never really felt like I was making meaningful decisions - there was always a clear and correct best way to use the cards in my hand. Maybe an expanded version would have some effects that create/expend some resource, like money?
🎤 Liam
26. Apr 2021 · 15:37 UTC
@stmatn Very good points, I had been logging out the odds myself at some points and considered actually having it in the UI. I think if I build a card game again, I'll try to crunch the numbers when I'm building early concepts. It might be a way to make me rein in any complexity in game jams, I'd realise early if something might be a headache to balance!
clemonades
26. Apr 2021 · 16:17 UTC
Wow this was awesome, I'm gonna play again in a bit and see if I can get further (that's how you know you made a fun game). Sadly I believe I was too sus for blue and that ultimately led to my downfall. Great job!
🎤 Liam
26. Apr 2021 · 17:04 UTC
@lsk oh for sure, it's v simple in a lot of ways, I think you can definitely make less than optimal decisions whilst you're figuring it out (which can be fun, probably one of the only ways it is now!). I think in an expanded version, it could also be a bit more of a deck builder so you can add in new cards/tactics after each opponent (maybe that make use of the loyalty mechanic more). I had always intended for another card that could sacrifice the "Loyal Friend" :speak_no_evil: Thanks for playing and the feedback!
🎤 Liam
26. Apr 2021 · 17:12 UTC
@clemonades Thank you! Glad you enjoyed it!
m11
26. Apr 2021 · 17:13 UTC
Brilliant - such an original take on the theme!
minibobbo
27. Apr 2021 · 03:48 UTC
This did take some time to figure out the rules and how the different systems interacted. Maybe there should be some quick animations to help us understand what is happening? I'm thinking something like the attack number and the defense number collide and leave the number of 'damage' you are going to take. Reading the descriptions and trying to understand them might turn some people off.

UI was simple and clean and didn't get in the way. The only suggestion there is maybe make the cards you play higher contrast. I know that the monitor I'm playing on is bright and has the colors slightly washed out, but it was very difficult to tell which cards I had already played this turn.

Nice job!
🎤 Liam
27. Apr 2021 · 10:14 UTC
@m11 Thanks! I wasn't sure of it was too much of a stretch but glad you thought so :smile:
🎤 Liam
27. Apr 2021 · 10:18 UTC
@minibobbo That would help so much, I was concerned that there was too much text to take in, but animations showing the interactions would improve the game a lot, thanks for playing and great feedback!

I was having a few problems with the hand draw animation, you may have seen a bug where when a"Under Suspicion" is removed, the animation plays again. My less than optimal solution for cards you'd played to change colour slightly instead, maybe a 30 degree rotate as well as more contrast. A very good point again!
cogcomp
29. Apr 2021 · 18:57 UTC
Clever idea! I'm not much for card games, so this would need something to raise the suspense slightly. Maybe music that changes based on the current state of the game?
🎤 Liam
30. Apr 2021 · 10:39 UTC
@cogcomp Thanks! One of the painful things about this jam was that I recorded some dialogue for the cards and spent hours making some tracks for encounters and everything else... then really struggled with the audio implementation. I just hadn't practiced with Howler and React beforehand which was my undoing. One of the terrible tracks is hidden in the source still!
tanis
01. May 2021 · 13:57 UTC
I must say that I'm not a big fan of card games, but it's clear that you've put some serious thoughts into this. I admit it was a bit hard for me to understand the gist of it in the beginning. I believe this is one of those games where a tutorial that helps you in the first phases of the game would really help. I can see this turning into a fully fledged game.
🎤 Liam
01. May 2021 · 14:00 UTC
@tanis Serious thanks for giving it a go then! I knew it might not be everyone's cup of tea and I think you're totally right, a tutorial/animated intro to explain a turn would help new players so much.
techsec
01. May 2021 · 15:13 UTC
Neat game some serious balance as well. The main issue is just that everyones health bar is so large. It would be better if the game went faster instead of playing the same hand for 5 minutes. But still great work!
Likirus
01. May 2021 · 15:27 UTC
Really interesting game. It took me a bit to understand all of the mechanics, but then there is a surprising amount of depth to the game.

Minor flaw: I normally have my browser window not maximized and the second tutorial screen has so much text that the "Let's go" button wasn't visible for me, I thought the game was broken at first, but then I discovered the button when I maximized my browser.
FadrikAlexander
01. May 2021 · 15:43 UTC
What a lovely game! and it's very creative, I love the combination between the card and politics system, I enjoyed the game and also saved to keep playing with it later, well done.
SoarenDev
01. May 2021 · 17:48 UTC
Ha so happy to see a card game here! Really original entry and take on the theme, really refreshing one !

So sad I'm quite bad, but I'll give it a try again later to completely finish it :D

Bravo to you for doing this in 48h !
🎤 Liam
02. May 2021 · 15:50 UTC
@techsec Thanks! I think some variety in the hands would help when the encounters are longer, that's probably what I will work on for v2.0 but I agree that the early battles should be quick!
🎤 Liam
02. May 2021 · 15:52 UTC
@likirus Glad you found it interesting! Thanks for pointing out that flaw, I would have liked to have spent some time sorting out the layout for screen sizes down to mobile but just didn't have the time. I'm going to fix the reset bug now but I will make sure the text gets a scroll bar if it overflows too.
🎤 Liam
02. May 2021 · 15:53 UTC
@fadrikalexander Thank you for the kind comment! Several hours in I was thinking: "oh no, this is gonna be too complex!" but comments like yours make me glad I stuck with it!
🎤 Liam
02. May 2021 · 15:56 UTC
@soarendev I'd got it into my head in the run up to LD48 that if I could come up with a card game for the theme then I was gonna go for it, I'm a big fan of card games and board games so just wanted to give it a shot! Thanks for playing and such a positive comment :smile: If you manage to have a good run, and after a few tries get the hang of the system then it's possible to really break the game and you'll win! Definitely some balance issues there! Thanks again!
FadrikAlexander
02. May 2021 · 15:58 UTC
@liam it's not complex it's simply not easy to understand what I mean by that everyone for example in slay the spire know the verb attack or the strength word or let's say poisen but in your game you have some words that are not commenlly used like influence, loyalty to a faction or suppression, I hope you get what I'm saying hhhhh even if the game have the same mechanics with any card game it representation is unique check "Urban Cards" for example
🎤 Liam
02. May 2021 · 16:02 UTC
@fadrikalexander 100%, I get what you mean :smile: I feel like some little animations to make it clear how the unfamiliar terms are in fact stuff a player might know already would have helped a lot (as suggested by a previous commenter)
PerfectSquare
02. May 2021 · 21:03 UTC
Really great game! It took me a while to figure out exactly how all the mechanics worked but after I did I was hooked! I ended up spending a ton of time playing until I figured out a strategy to win...it got super intense when I had 95% suspicion on the final opponent :sweat_smile: Thanks for sharing such a wonderful game!
PiJaMar
02. May 2021 · 23:58 UTC
Very fun card game with an innovative concept neatly tied together by an interesting, funny story. Would love to see more of it!

The only criticism I have is that I felt that my actions were rarely strategically impactful, apart from deciding when and how to defend, but this is not so important if the goal of the game is to focus on the narrative. I'm impressed on how you were able to "paint a picture" through gameplay. I hope you keep fleshing this game out as it has immense potential for a commercial title, great entry!
BoxedMeatRevolution
03. May 2021 · 02:43 UTC
Fun game. The instructions at the beginning were very confusing, so I had to lose once to get the hang of it, but on my second run I was able to win. I thought there were some fun elements of strategy in how you needed to manage resources over many fights. The strategy I settled on in the end was a little simple, but I still felt like I was barely hanging on in the last boss fights.
emmyoop
08. May 2021 · 20:38 UTC
Awesome game. I love that you could change the text speed. nice polish.
🎤 Liam
09. May 2021 · 10:01 UTC
@perfectsquare Really glad you enjoyed it, I think most of the fun people have had is when they are figuring out the game's slightly obscure system, then you get your strat and it's then possible to win :smiley: Thanks for playing!
🎤 Liam
09. May 2021 · 10:03 UTC
@pijamar Because of comments like yours, I am definitely going to work on building a more polished version, building a card game has been fun and I'd like to get better at it. Definitely agree that once you've figured out the game, the optimal play is often only the same set of decisions and it would be much much better if you had more impact on the strategy. Thanks for playing!
🎤 Liam
09. May 2021 · 10:06 UTC
@boxedmeatrevolution Really nice to hear you had fun! I have learnt my lesson about big blocks of instructions, a tutorial and in game tips will be the way I go in future! :laughing: Thanks for playing!
🎤 Liam
09. May 2021 · 10:07 UTC
@emmyoop I'm guessing you were rating a bunch of diff games at the same time :smile: So thanks for playing but I think adjustable text speed was a diff game!
jacic
11. May 2021 · 21:06 UTC
This is a unique blend of mechanics! It's a little hard to understand at first, though. Well done on this entry!
🎤 Liam
15. May 2021 · 10:14 UTC
@jacic Thanks! I was pretty unsure about it during the compo but I'm happy with what got built now
radmccool
16. May 2021 · 15:18 UTC
uk politics is in fact the worst. Machiavelli himself would blush at the unscrupulous duplicity.

and that is something i think you recreated with this game. i cant say i fully understood everything that was happening or even the entire concequences for my actions but the idea of some bastard in the background playing both sides is the most british thing i can think of.
Robonaut121
16. May 2021 · 19:22 UTC
Looks like a great game, but when I go fullscreen in the web browser, my screen isn't big enough to fit in the "end turn" button, so I kind of just click cards until I'm softlocked. If this is fixed, I can't wait to try it!