{"author_link":"\/users\/igor-kingamer","author_name":"Igor KinGamer","author_uid":"igor-kingamer","comments":[],"epoch":1527819317,"event":"LD41","format":"md","ldjam_node_id":97375,"likes":3,"metadata":{"p_key":"115562","p_author":"Igor KinGamer","p_authorkey":"1000299","p_urlkey":"331522","p_title":"Do these ideas have potential?","p_cat":"LDJam ","p_event":"LD41","p_time":"1527819317","p_likes":"3","p_comments":"0","p_status":"WAYBACK","us_key":"1000299","us_name":"Igor KinGamer","us_username":"igor-kingamer","event_start":"1524182400","event_key":"72","event_name":"LD 41"},"node":{"_collation":{"body_sanitizer":"TextUtils::SanitizeHTML via existing importer","event":"LD41","removed_author":false},"_superparent":73256,"_trust":8,"author":299,"body":"Firstly, sorry for the pun.\n\nWhat do you think about a new category for ratings, \"Potential\"? I.e., how much potential does the game have? How good\/better would it (probably) be if it was developed into a full game? In other (LD-oriented) words, how better could it get if there was more time?\n\nWhat made me think about this is the fact that people (me included)\nfrequently don't manage to get many *(amazing!1!!)* features into the game.\nThis would give us a sense of whether it's worth to keep working on the game.\nYes, there's feedback for that --\nbut think how cool it would be (or not?) to see the games with the most potential!\n\nGoing further, are there any other (non-redundant) categories you think it would be nice to add? Progression (whether difficulty increases gradually), Gameplay, ...?\nWe could have optional categories -- maybe hidden by default or so when rating, so people don't get overwhelmed -- that don't affect Ratings given\/received.\nAlso, the description of the categories could be shown somehow (in fact, this is independent of the discussion in this post).\n\nLastly, changing the subject: would it be interesting to have some measure of dispersion in the results for each category?\n\nSorry if some or all of this have already been discussed and I missed it.\n\nShare your thoughts on what's good and what's terrible! :speaking_head: :slight_smile:","comments":10,"comments-timestamp":"2018-06-08T11:54:33Z","created":"2018-06-01T00:23:37Z","files":[],"files-timestamp":0,"id":97375,"love":3,"love-timestamp":"2018-06-02T03:31:44Z","meta":[],"modified":"2018-06-08T11:54:33Z","name":"Do these ideas have potential?","node-timestamp":"2018-06-01T02:15:35Z","parent":73808,"parents":[1,5,9,73256,73808],"path":"\/events\/ludum-dare\/41\/puzz-snake\/do-those-ideas-have-potential","published":"2018-06-01T02:15:17Z","scope":"public","slug":"do-those-ideas-have-potential","subsubtype":"","subtype":"","type":"post","version":288441},"node_metadata":{"n_key":"97375","n_urlkey":"331522","n_parent":"73808","n_path":"\/events\/ludum-dare\/41\/puzz-snake\/do-those-ideas-have-potential","n_slug":"do-those-ideas-have-potential","n_type":"post","n_subtype":"","n_subsubtype":"","n_author":"299","n_created":"1527812617","n_modified":"1528458873","n_version":"288441","n_status":"WAYBACK"},"source_url":"https:\/\/ldjam.com\/events\/ludum-dare\/41\/puzz-snake\/do-those-ideas-have-potential","text":"Firstly, sorry for the pun.\n\nWhat do you think about a new category for ratings, \"Potential\"? I.e., how much potential does the game have? How good\/better would it (probably) be if it was developed into a full game? In other (LD-oriented) words, how better could it get if there was more time?\n\nWhat made me think about this is the fact that people (me included)\nfrequently don't manage to get many *(amazing!1!!)* features into the game.\nThis would give us a sense of whether it's worth to keep working on the game.\nYes, there's feedback for that --\nbut think how cool it would be (or not?) to see the games with the most potential!\n\nGoing further, are there any other (non-redundant) categories you think it would be nice to add? Progression (whether difficulty increases gradually), Gameplay, ...?\nWe could have optional categories -- maybe hidden by default or so when rating, so people don't get overwhelmed -- that don't affect Ratings given\/received.\nAlso, the description of the categories could be shown somehow (in fact, this is independent of the discussion in this post).\n\nLastly, changing the subject: would it be interesting to have some measure of dispersion in the results for each category?\n\nSorry if some or all of this have already been discussed and I missed it.\n\nShare your thoughts on what's good and what's terrible! :speaking_head: :slight_smile:","title":"Do these ideas have potential?","wayback_source":[]}