OK, my computer\u00a0has quite a good CPU (which is the main bottleneck to this test, as it runs in a single thread), but it’s possible to achieve\u00a0nice results even\u00a0at smaller FPSs:<\/p>\n (Small cheat: on this seconds screenshot, the particles are being sorted and rendered from oldest to yongest, so it takes quite some more time to update and I can’t get it to run much better – i.e., at highers FPS or with more particles – than this…)<\/p>\n How about giving it a try? I could really use some testing in various\u00a0machines… So far, I’ve only tested in 4 environments:<\/p>\n It ran nicely\u00a0in all of those, though I couldn’t get it to run at 120 FPS nor with too many particles on the i3 on Windows. It glitched\u00a0if I tried to run the test\u00a0at anything more than 120 particles per frame and 60 FPS… Since it work as expected on Ubuntu, I suspecting it happened because I still haven’t updated the video drivers on the Windows 8…<\/p>\n So, if you guys could test it and give some feedback, I would be really grateful! You can get it here<\/a>, for Windows, and directly from its repository<\/a> (on github), for Linux. I’m still working on some things, so\u00a0the devel \u00a0branch (not<\/strong> the master!!) must be cloned. If anyone wants to try it on Linux, get in contact and I’ll rewrite the README and add some missing pointers…<\/p>\n I think the next thing I want to do is to get it to run on emscript. It would be great if it worked nicely before the next LD. (last time I tried, I run into a few issues…)<\/p>\n Thanks for reading! See ya!<\/p>\n <\/p>","time":"November 23rd, 2015 8:27 pm","title":"GFraMe v2.0.0-rc4"}![\"gframe_120fps_2\"](\"http:\/\/ludumdare.com\/compo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/gframe_120fps_2.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\n \n