{"author_link":"\/users\/mathstr0fficial","author_name":"Mathstr0fficial","author_uid":"mathstr0fficial","comments":[],"epoch":1547216840,"event":"LD43","format":"md","ldjam_node_id":138533,"likes":4,"metadata":{"p_key":"127671","p_author":"Mathstr0fficial","p_authorkey":"1012836","p_urlkey":"343793","p_title":"My Results!","p_cat":"LDJam ","p_event":"LD43","p_time":"1547216840","p_likes":"4","p_comments":"0","p_status":"WAYBACK","us_key":"1012836","us_name":"Mathstr0fficial","us_username":"mathstr0fficial","event_start":"1543536000","event_key":"71","event_name":"LD 43"},"node":{"_collation":{"body_sanitizer":"TextUtils::SanitizeHTML via existing importer","event":"LD43","removed_author":false},"_superparent":120415,"_trust":5,"author":12836,"body":"I spent way too long getting this out, so here we are.\n\n![Screenshot 2019-01-02 at 08.45.26.png](\/\/\/raw\/422\/3\/z\/1ff2e.png)\n\nThey're obviously not great scores, but I can definitely understand why. \n\nOverall: A pretty low score, though a serviceable point average. (I, as most people should, use my point averages as my general basis on whether or not it's a good category.) Many people complained of absurdly high difficulty, though it was good otherwise. I completely agree. A post jam version is just about done with better balancing of the light loss and a ranged weapon.\n\nFun: Only slightly lower than Overall, in both score and point average. Again, people enjoyed it, but found it frustrating and thus didn't have as good of a time.\n\nInnovation: A ~~score~~ point average I'm actually pretty proud of. My idea seemed pretty common, but apparently it hasn't been used very often. I'm glad it worked out, it's one I'm not sure I can top any time soon.\n\nTheme: My highest score *and* point average. I like that I didn't have to tell people the theme connection, even people who didn't even read my page knew how I implemented the theme. This is a feeling I really want to duplicate in my future entries.\n\nGraphics: One that I'm not particularly proud of. The graphics definitely needed some work, though the fact that you couldn't see the graphics most of the time probably didn't help.\n\nAudio: Another lower point average. My 2nd highest score, however, probably because most people don't do any audio. It could've been better, some minor volume tweaks would've gone a long way.\n\nMood: A pretty solid point average. If you look at my post-mortem (which I'm not going to link because if you care you can search for it), you'll see that I felt like the music really helps convey the spooky nature of the low visibility. While I still agree with that statement, I also feel that the darker colors and general low saturation helped as well.\n\nAll things considered, a pretty solid entry, and I look forward to the next one already.","comments":3,"comments-timestamp":"2019-01-30T00:23:04Z","created":"2019-01-11T13:19:22Z","files":[],"files-timestamp":0,"id":138533,"love":4,"love-timestamp":"2019-01-13T17:10:21Z","meta":[],"modified":"2019-01-30T00:23:04Z","name":"My Results!","node-timestamp":"2019-01-11T14:27:20Z","parent":120691,"parents":[1,5,9,120415,120691],"path":"\/events\/ludum-dare\/43\/ludum-dare-43-entry\/my-results","published":"2019-01-11T14:27:20Z","scope":"public","slug":"my-results","subsubtype":"","subtype":"","type":"post","version":417198},"node_metadata":{"n_key":"138533","n_urlkey":"343793","n_parent":"120691","n_path":"\/events\/ludum-dare\/43\/ludum-dare-43-entry\/my-results","n_slug":"my-results","n_type":"post","n_subtype":"","n_subsubtype":"","n_author":"12836","n_created":"1547212762","n_modified":"1548807784","n_version":"417198","n_status":"WAYBACK"},"source_url":"https:\/\/ldjam.com\/events\/ludum-dare\/43\/ludum-dare-43-entry\/my-results","text":"I spent way too long getting this out, so here we are.\n\n![Screenshot 2019-01-02 at 08.45.26.png](\/\/\/raw\/422\/3\/z\/1ff2e.png)\n\nThey're obviously not great scores, but I can definitely understand why. \n\nOverall: A pretty low score, though a serviceable point average. (I, as most people should, use my point averages as my general basis on whether or not it's a good category.) Many people complained of absurdly high difficulty, though it was good otherwise. I completely agree. A post jam version is just about done with better balancing of the light loss and a ranged weapon.\n\nFun: Only slightly lower than Overall, in both score and point average. Again, people enjoyed it, but found it frustrating and thus didn't have as good of a time.\n\nInnovation: A ~~score~~ point average I'm actually pretty proud of. My idea seemed pretty common, but apparently it hasn't been used very often. I'm glad it worked out, it's one I'm not sure I can top any time soon.\n\nTheme: My highest score *and* point average. I like that I didn't have to tell people the theme connection, even people who didn't even read my page knew how I implemented the theme. This is a feeling I really want to duplicate in my future entries.\n\nGraphics: One that I'm not particularly proud of. The graphics definitely needed some work, though the fact that you couldn't see the graphics most of the time probably didn't help.\n\nAudio: Another lower point average. My 2nd highest score, however, probably because most people don't do any audio. It could've been better, some minor volume tweaks would've gone a long way.\n\nMood: A pretty solid point average. If you look at my post-mortem (which I'm not going to link because if you care you can search for it), you'll see that I felt like the music really helps convey the spooky nature of the low visibility. While I still agree with that statement, I also feel that the darker colors and general low saturation helped as well.\n\nAll things considered, a pretty solid entry, and I look forward to the next one already.","title":"My Results!","wayback_source":[]}