{"author_link": "/users/notnullnotvoid", "author_name": "notnullnotvoid", "author_uid": "notnullnotvoid", "comments": [], "epoch": 1587146314, "event": "LD46", "format": "md", "ldjam_node_id": 191512, "likes": 7, "metadata": {"p_key": "138808", "p_author": "notnullnotvoid", "p_authorkey": "1090859", "p_urlkey": "355153", "p_title": "Incorrectly predicting the theme", "p_cat": "LDJam ", "p_event": "LD46", "p_time": "1587146314", "p_likes": "7", "p_comments": "0", "p_status": "WAYBACK", "us_key": "1090859", "us_name": "notnullnotvoid", "us_username": "notnullnotvoid", "event_start": "1587081600", "event_key": "77", "event_name": "Ludum Dare 46"}, "node": {"_collation": {"body_sanitizer": "TextUtils::SanitizeHTML via existing importer", "event": "LD46", "removed_author": false}, "_superparent": 176557, "_trust": 2, "author": 90859, "body": "I've added up final round theme votes from 56 screenshots posted on the ldjam.com site, the #LDJAM twitter hashtag, and the unofficial Ludum Dare discord. Here are the results:\n```\nDreams          - 5\nPower source    -11\nNon-violent     - 8\nAbandoned       -10\n1 minute        -13\nDecay           - 8\nSide effects    - 2\nFragile         -14\nOutdated tech   -17\nRuins           -17\nMomentum        -20\nAutomation      - 5\nKeep it alive     5\nGarden          - 2\nConnections       1\n```\nPlease be advised, I don't claim that this has any real predictive power whatsoever. The small sample size and likely sampling bias are huge methodological flaws. Consider this list as just a curiosity.", "comments": 6, "comments-timestamp": "2020-04-20T01:08:04Z", "created": "2020-04-17T17:50:57Z", "files": [], "files-timestamp": 0, "id": 191512, "love": 7, "love-timestamp": "2020-04-18T09:09:16Z", "meta": [], "modified": "2020-04-20T01:08:04Z", "name": "Incorrectly predicting the theme", "node-timestamp": "2020-04-17T18:41:13Z", "parent": 183050, "parents": [1, 5, 9, 176557, 183050], "path": "/events/ludum-dare/46/stranded-2/incorrectly-predicting-the-theme", "published": "2020-04-17T17:58:34Z", "scope": "public", "slug": "incorrectly-predicting-the-theme", "subsubtype": "", "subtype": "", "type": "post", "version": 554975}, "node_metadata": {"n_key": "191512", "n_urlkey": "355153", "n_parent": "183050", "n_path": "/events/ludum-dare/46/stranded-2/incorrectly-predicting-the-theme", "n_slug": "incorrectly-predicting-the-theme", "n_type": "post", "n_subtype": "", "n_subsubtype": "", "n_author": "90859", "n_created": "1587145857", "n_modified": "1587344884", "n_version": "554975", "n_status": "WAYBACK"}, "source_url": "https://ldjam.com/events/ludum-dare/46/stranded-2/incorrectly-predicting-the-theme", "text": "I've added up final round theme votes from 56 screenshots posted on the ldjam.com site, the #LDJAM twitter hashtag, and the unofficial Ludum Dare discord. Here are the results:\n```\nDreams          - 5\nPower source    -11\nNon-violent     - 8\nAbandoned       -10\n1 minute        -13\nDecay           - 8\nSide effects    - 2\nFragile         -14\nOutdated tech   -17\nRuins           -17\nMomentum        -20\nAutomation      - 5\nKeep it alive     5\nGarden          - 2\nConnections       1\n```\nPlease be advised, I don't claim that this has any real predictive power whatsoever. The small sample size and likely sampling bias are huge methodological flaws. Consider this list as just a curiosity.", "title": "Incorrectly predicting the theme", "wayback_source": []}