Now don't get me wrong, I'm not mad at anyone and I want people to make games however they want. There's a chance that I don't know something important so please correct me if I'm wrong.

Ok, there's a design error that I've noticed in the last month. My friend and I made a game this jam and it was awesome as always, but due to school and other stuff, we could only rate about 43 games total (about 21 each). Now, we got 40 ratings and that's ok, it's a 1:1 ratio and I get it. But there are games made by about 5+ people, which means that if each team member has made the same effort as we did (played and rated 20 games), they will get to 100 ratings +-. That's a little bit broken because it leaves games like us in the back, is there a factor that takes into account the team size?

Again, I get this isn't the point of this jam and there's no prize at the end, I have a blast playing games and they're really awesome. I have nothing against big teams, they usually make super good games. :)

So, is there a balance for it?