{"author_name":"Tom Francis","cat":"LD #19 - Discovery - 2010","comments":[],"epoch":1292806620,"likes":1,"metadata":{"p_key":"67747","p_author":"Tom Francis","p_authorkey":"3103","p_urlkey":"103550","p_title":"Day 2, 1:55AM: Done","p_cat":"LD #19 - Discovery - 2010","p_event":"LD19","p_time":"1292806620","p_likes":"1","p_comments":"0","p_status":"UPD5","us_key":"3103","us_name":"Tom Francis","us_username":"pentadact","event_start":"1292544000","event_key":"5","event_name":"LD19"},"text":"

Jeeesus. Five minutes to go, and my game is zipped up and submitted. Grab it here<\/a>. Feels strange and amazing to be ‘done’ with something – I’ve tinkered around with games for months without getting to a point I’m happy with. And while there are a few items not grayed out on my Scanno to do list, I did much more than I ever thought I could in two days. And I actually have fun playing the result.<\/p>\n

Rather embarrassed about Gunpoint now. It could probably be done in a week.<\/p>\n

\"Scanno<\/a><\/p>\n

The finished game is pretty much what I planned: a top-down shooter with randomised enemies, whose randomised bits you can steal for yourself. I didn’t end up scaling much dynamically, except the gun sizes. I couldn’t find a way to make it look right in the time, so it was quicker – even for me – to draw a few engine and weapon types. The differences are more immediately interesting, too – “Ooh, blue plasma?”<\/p>\n

\"Scanno<\/a><\/p>\n

Number one thing that went right was definitely time management. I had two days, so I picked something I thought I might just about be able to do in one. It was done in one and a half, so I had that crucial half day to take a working concept, find the fun, and make the game about that. <\/p>\n

I don’t know if I actually made<\/em> it fun, but it’s so much closer than it would have been if I’d picked a more ambitious idea and only just got the basics hammered out. This is my first finished game, and given the time limit I thought I’d end up with something a lot more half-baked.<\/p>\n

It is buggy, and its tutorial is just gibberish, but in an ideal circumstance it’s conceivable that it could convey to you what you need to know. Oh, except that you have to press R to restart.<\/p>\n

\"Scanno<\/a><\/p>\n

Thing that went least well was trouble shooting. I’m rarely good at this, but on the scanning ray in particular I just went out of my mind. It’s still buggy – won’t always scan everything there is to scan on your first scan – and I may have messed up other things in the last minute fixes.<\/p>\n

\"Scanno<\/a><\/p>\n

I said I was going to leave graphics till last, but in the end I decided it was worth a stab at them if I gave myself a hard time limit. I basically managed to turn the visuals from offensively ugly to merely very crude. I’m OK with crude. There’s just a particular look to very bad graphics that’s not endearing or ignorable or in any way OK, and I had to try to avoid that.<\/p>\n

I also took time to put in sounds for almost everything important, and I’m really glad I did. I knew they’d be important to the feel, but I didn’t quite appreciate how important the feel would be to the overall thing. It’s not an art game, it’s not very brave or inventive, so it really needs to have some decent ‘pew pew!’s in.<\/p>\n

I have exactly no time tomorrow to polish this up and also submit it to the jam, the less strict contest that gives an extra day. Which is a shame, because it needs a few bandages to hold it together properly, and a few basic human rights like a choice of resolutions. I will do those things, just not right away. For now, I am done. Thanks for reading.<\/p>","time":"December 19th, 2010 7:57 pm","title":"Day 2, 1:55AM: Done"}