Redundancy Redundancy Redundancy Redundancy

I’m really waiting for this!

I’m really waiting for this!

Comments

KoryWazHere
16. Dec 2010 · 13:55 UTC
well that’s a bit redundant…
SurplusGamer
16. Dec 2010 · 13:56 UTC
More recursion, really.
16. Dec 2010 · 15:17 UTC
Why are people posting things two times when it’s about redundancy?

Wouldn’t 10 or 100 times for example be redundant?
GreaseMonkey
16. Dec 2010 · 17:36 UTC
You don’t have to repeat the whole thing, just a hash / reed-solomon code of what you say. But anyways, wrt what bernardfrancois said, I’ll be using 8×8 tiles lots of times over (because you can’t *really* fill the 32×24-tile screen with the 448 tiles you have available).