{"author_name":"Jordan Magnuson","cat":"LD #16 - Exploration - 2009","comments":[],"epoch":1261444740,"likes":0,"metadata":{"p_key":"71682","p_author":"Jordan Magnuson","p_authorkey":"1382","p_urlkey":"107504","p_title":"Regarding bug fixes","p_cat":"LD #16 - Exploration - 2009","p_event":"LD16","p_time":"1261444740","p_likes":"0","p_comments":"0","p_status":"UPD5","us_key":"1382","us_name":"Jordan Magnuson","us_username":"jordan_magnuson","event_start":"1260489600","event_key":"2","event_name":"LD16"},"text":"<p>I <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ludumdare.com\/compo\/2009\/12\/20\/5-colors-pandora-more-bugs-fixed\/\">posted a little while back<\/a> about a fixing some bugs in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ludumdare.com\/compo\/ludum-dare-16\/?action=rate&amp;uid=1382\">5 Colors<\/a>. Codexus was (appropriately) worried that I was fixing non-critical bugs, so I clarified that the bugs I fixed were indeed critical: I haven&#8217;t made any additions to my game, or fixed any bugs that were not game-stopping.<\/p>\n <p>However, I do have some questions regarding the rules as they apply to bug fixes, because the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ludumdare.com\/wiki\/ld16:submit?s[]=bugs\">LD rules wiki<\/a> is not entirely clear.<\/p>\n <p>On the one hand it says: &#8220;After the deadline, we do allow bugfixes.  You&#8217;re allowed to fix any <span>bugs<\/span> that stop a player from playing or finishing your game,&#8221; which suggests that non-critical bug fixes are not allowed.<\/p>\n <p>But it then goes on to state: &#8220;New content however is outside the scope of what&#8217;s considered a bugfix,&#8221; which would suggest that bug fixes are allowed, as long as you are not adding new content to the game.<\/p>\n <p><strong>So my question is, what is the LD policy\/consensus when it comes to non-critical bug fixes?<\/strong> This seems to be a fairly laid-back community, which I really appreciate, but at the same time, it&#8217;s clear from peoples&#8217; posts that everyone wants to &#8220;play fair,&#8221; so a clarification of rules seems like it would be good.<\/p>\n <p>Personally I don\u2019t see why people should not be encouraged to fix bugs, as bugs really aren\u2019t part of the design of a game, which seems to be what LD is about (and even if bugs are fixed quickly, they will still effect some people, and hurt the game)&#8211;but others may feel differently. If bug fixes other than critical are <em>not <\/em>allowed, I think that a \u201ctechnical\u201d category should be added for judging the games.<\/p>\n <p>Something to consider is that it may be a bit tricky to distinguish between \u201ccritical\u201d and \u201cnoncritical\u201d bugs at times: what if you have a bug that doesn&#8217;t make the game completely unplayable, but which makes it really frustrating all the way through?<\/p>\n <p>Perhaps this is something to vote on?<\/p>","time":"December 21st, 2009 8:19 pm","title":"Regarding bug fixes"}