{"author_link":"\/users\/lars-dk","author_name":"Lars DK","author_uid":"lars-dk","comments":[],"epoch":1495323176,"event":"LD38","format":"md","ldjam_node_id":31897,"likes":2,"metadata":{"p_key":"94197","p_author":"Lars DK","p_authorkey":"1010164","p_urlkey":"307115","p_title":"My Results","p_cat":"LDJam ","p_event":"LD38","p_time":"1495323176","p_likes":"2","p_comments":"0","p_status":"WAYBACK","us_key":"1010164","us_name":"Lars DK","us_username":"lars-dk","event_start":"1492732800","event_key":"69","event_name":"LD 38"},"node":{"_collation":{"body_sanitizer":"TextUtils::SanitizeHTML via existing importer","event":"LD38","removed_author":false},"_superparent":9405,"_trust":3,"author":10164,"body":"So, **here's what I got** from you guys on my first little jam game.\n* Mood: #279 (top 16%). This makes sense. I didn't spend a ton of time checking the mood after all. The game had a nice board-game vibe though which I think some people appreciated.\n* Humor: #530 (top 29%). Well, to be fair 100% of my humor was trying to come up with silly names for cards. I'm not a super funny person, so I absolutely think judges were right on this.\n* Audio: #66 (top 4%). Aww, that's disappointing, I was hoping to do a bit better on this one. One or two people mentioned fitting the music better to my theme and there was one sound effect I never got around to making. Still though my goal was to be in the top-50 of all jam games, and I do think my game deserves to be there.\n* Graphics: #528 (top 29%). This one, on the other hand, I agree with. I know I have a long way to go with making graphics! I'm learning and I'm far from perfect at the moment.\n* Theme: #598 (top 33%). I'm a bit puzzled by this one. Not 100% sure why my score is so low... will need to reflect more on that. Maybe there was too much freedom of movement?\n* Innovation: #130 (top 8%). Cool! This is an ok result for me, and something I always try to build on. \n* Fun: #175 (top 10%). A lack of a tutorial probably hurt me a lot here. I want to improve on this and I can definitely see what was missing, which is always nice because that's how you learn.\n* Overall: #154 (top 9%). This is better than the average of the rest of my scores so I'm glad I made an impression!\n\nSome thoughts:\n* Even though this was a jam entry, I did everything without a team. Maybe if I had a team I'd have scored higher on a few of these points. For example I spent a lot of time making graphics that sucked anyway. Seems like all the best jam entries were made by teams!\n* So nice to have meaningful constructive feedback on a lot of these points! Some reviewers really put in a lot of effort!\n* I am still going ahead with making an awesome version of the game that I hope to release soon.\n* And I hope to do this all again later!\n\nThanks everyone for an AMAZING experience!","comments":0,"created":"2017-05-20T22:43:36Z","files":[],"files-timestamp":0,"id":31897,"love":2,"love-timestamp":"2017-05-21T00:05:45Z","meta":[],"modified":"2017-05-21T00:05:45Z","name":"My Results","node-timestamp":"2017-05-20T23:32:56Z","parent":15238,"parents":[1,5,9,9405,15238],"path":"\/events\/ludum-dare\/38\/conquer-earth-1\/my-results","published":"2017-05-20T23:32:56Z","scope":"public","slug":"my-results","subsubtype":"","subtype":"","type":"post","version":85892},"node_metadata":{"n_key":"31897","n_urlkey":"307115","n_parent":"15238","n_path":"\/events\/ludum-dare\/38\/conquer-earth-1\/my-results","n_slug":"my-results","n_type":"post","n_subtype":"","n_subsubtype":"","n_author":"10164","n_created":"1495320216","n_modified":"1495325145","n_version":"85892","n_status":"WAYBACK"},"source_url":"https:\/\/ldjam.com\/events\/ludum-dare\/38\/conquer-earth-1\/my-results","text":"So, **here's what I got** from you guys on my first little jam game.\n* Mood: #279 (top 16%). This makes sense. I didn't spend a ton of time checking the mood after all. The game had a nice board-game vibe though which I think some people appreciated.\n* Humor: #530 (top 29%). Well, to be fair 100% of my humor was trying to come up with silly names for cards. I'm not a super funny person, so I absolutely think judges were right on this.\n* Audio: #66 (top 4%). Aww, that's disappointing, I was hoping to do a bit better on this one. One or two people mentioned fitting the music better to my theme and there was one sound effect I never got around to making. Still though my goal was to be in the top-50 of all jam games, and I do think my game deserves to be there.\n* Graphics: #528 (top 29%). This one, on the other hand, I agree with. I know I have a long way to go with making graphics! I'm learning and I'm far from perfect at the moment.\n* Theme: #598 (top 33%). I'm a bit puzzled by this one. Not 100% sure why my score is so low... will need to reflect more on that. Maybe there was too much freedom of movement?\n* Innovation: #130 (top 8%). Cool! This is an ok result for me, and something I always try to build on. \n* Fun: #175 (top 10%). A lack of a tutorial probably hurt me a lot here. I want to improve on this and I can definitely see what was missing, which is always nice because that's how you learn.\n* Overall: #154 (top 9%). This is better than the average of the rest of my scores so I'm glad I made an impression!\n\nSome thoughts:\n* Even though this was a jam entry, I did everything without a team. Maybe if I had a team I'd have scored higher on a few of these points. For example I spent a lot of time making graphics that sucked anyway. Seems like all the best jam entries were made by teams!\n* So nice to have meaningful constructive feedback on a lot of these points! Some reviewers really put in a lot of effort!\n* I am still going ahead with making an awesome version of the game that I hope to release soon.\n* And I hope to do this all again later!\n\nThanks everyone for an AMAZING experience!","title":"My Results","wayback_source":[]}